Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Respir Med ; 210: 107178, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2251731

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies suggested that Macklin sign is a predictor of barotrauma in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We performed a systematic review to further characterize the clinical role of Macklin. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register and Embase were searched for studies reporting data on Macklin. Studies without data on chest CT, pediatric studies, non-human and cadaver studies, case reports and series including <5 patients were excluded. The primary objective was to assess the number of patients with Macklin sign and barotrauma. Secondary objectives were: occurrence of Macklin in different populations, clinical use of Macklin, prognostic impact of Macklin. RESULTS: Seven studies enrolling 979 patients were included. Macklin was present in 4-22% of COVID-19 patients. It was associated with barotrauma in 124/138 (89.8%) of cases. Macklin sign preceded barotrauma in 65/69 cases (94.2%) 3-8 days in advance. Four studies used Macklin as pathophysiological explanation for barotrauma, two studies as a predictor of barotrauma and one as a decision-making tool. Two studies suggested that Macklin is a strong predictor of barotrauma in ARDS patients and one study used Macklin sign to candidate high-risk ARDS patients to awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A possible correlation between Macklin and worse prognosis was suggested in two studies on COVID-19 and blunt chest trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing evidence suggests that Macklin sign anticipate barotrauma in patients with ARDS and there are initial reports on use of Macklin as a decision-making tool. Further studies investigating the role of Macklin sign in ARDS are justified.


Subject(s)
Barotrauma , COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Thoracic Injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Humans , Child , Thoracic Injuries/complications , COVID-19/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Barotrauma/complications , Barotrauma/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects
2.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 49: e20223300, 2022.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2002363

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to identify variables related to pleural complications in patients undergoing tube thoracostomies due to traumatic injuries. METHOD: we conducted a prospective observational study from May/2019 to January/2021 including adult trauma patients submitted to tube thoracostomies after hospital admission. Patients undergoing thoracotomies as the initial treatment were not included. We excluded patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis during the hospitalization. Pleural complications were defined as clotted hemothorax, residual pneumothorax and empyema. Students t, Mann Whitneys, Chi square and Fishers exact test were used to compare variables between groups. We considered p<0.05 as significant. RESULTS: we analyzed 68 patients. The mean age was 36.0 + 12.6 years and 91.2% were male. The mean RTS and ISS were, respectively, 7.0 ± 1.6 and 15.9 ± 7.6. The most frequent trauma mechanism was stab wounds in 50.0%, followed by blunt trauma in 38.2%. The severity of thoracic injuries was stratified (AIS) as 2 (4.4%), 3 (80.9%), 4 (13.2%), e 5 (1.5%). Pleural complications happened in 14 (20.5%) patients, being clotted / residual hemothorax (11.8%), residual pneumothorax (4.4%), empyema (2.9%) and miscellaneous (1.4%). These patients were treated by thoracoscopy (5), thoracotomy (3), chest re-drainage (3) and clinical measures alone (3). There was a significant association between pleural complications with the time of permanence (p<0,001) and the necessity of relocation (p<0,001) of the drain. CONCLUSION: the predictors of pleural complications in this series were time of permanence and the necessity of relocation of the drain.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Empyema , Pneumothorax , Thoracic Injuries , Adult , COVID-19 Testing , Chest Tubes/adverse effects , Empyema/etiology , Female , Hemothorax/etiology , Hemothorax/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumothorax/epidemiology , Pneumothorax/etiology , Pneumothorax/surgery , Prospective Studies , Thoracic Injuries/complications , Thoracic Injuries/surgery , Thoracostomy , Thoracotomy , Young Adult
3.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 17(1): 145, 2022 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1879249

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of diaphragmatic rupture is low; however, it may be life threatening. Normally caused by blunt trauma, some cases are reported after pulmonary infections with extensive coughing. Covid 19 causes pulmonary infections and pneumonia and has been associated with weakening of the diaphragm after prolonged ventilation. We present a patient who suffered from diaphragmatic rupture 2 months after recovering from a severe Covid 19 pneumonia. CASE: A 71 years old male patient presented with massive thoraco-abdominal pain and severe dyspnea. At the time of admission, the patient was diagnosed with rupture of the diaphragm and developed cardiogenic shock. Intraoperatively there was a 4 cm diameter large rupture of the diaphragm with enterothorax (transverse colon, stomach, spleen, parts of the jejunum). Avulsion of the mesenteric arteries made a segmental resection of the jejunum together with the spleen necessary. A jejuno-jejunostomy was performed and organs were replaced into the abdomen. The rupture of the diaphragm underwent primary closure with non-resorbable suture material. The patient has shown an uneventful post-operative course, fully recovered and was discharged on day 11 after surgery. CONCLUSION: Covid 19 is a disease that is known to have various effects on different organs. The diaphragm is only paid heed in case of dysfunction. Also in the setting of Covid 19 it is not known as prominent effector organ. Nevertheless its affection by coughing caused by Covid 19 can lead to life threatening complications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hernia, Diaphragmatic, Traumatic , Thoracic Injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Diaphragm/surgery , Hernia, Diaphragmatic, Traumatic/etiology , Humans , Male , Rupture/etiology , Thoracic Injuries/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications
4.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 48(6): 4719-4726, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1857925

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Polytrauma and respiratory tract damage after thoracic trauma cause about 25% of mortality among severely injured patients. Thoracic trauma can lead to the development of severe lung complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, and is, therefore, of great interest for monitoring in intensive care units (ICU). In recent years, club cell protein (CC)16 with its antioxidant properties has proven to be a potential outcome-related marker. In this study, we evaluated whether CC16 constitutes as a marker of lung damage in a porcine polytrauma model. METHODS: In a 72 h ICU polytrauma pig model (thoracic trauma, tibial fracture, hemorrhagic shock, liver laceration), blood plasma samples (0, 3, 9, 24, 48, 72 h), BAL samples (72 h) and lung tissue (72 h) were collected. The trauma group (PT) was compared to a sham group. CC16 as a possible biomarker for lung injury in this model, and IL-8 concentrations as known indicator for ongoing inflammation during trauma were determined by ELISA. Histological analysis of ZO-1 and determination of total protein content were used to show barrier disruption and edema formation in lung tissue from the trauma group. RESULTS: Systemic CC16 levels were significantly increased early after polytrauma compared vs. sham. After 72 h, CC16 concentration was significantly increased in lung tissue as well as in BAL in PT vs. sham. Similarly, IL-8 and total protein content in BAL were significantly increased in PT vs. sham. Evaluation of ZO-1 staining showed significantly lower signal intensity for polytrauma. CONCLUSION: The data confirm for the first time in a larger animal polytrauma model that lung damage was indicated by systemic and/or local CC16 response. Thus, early plasma and late BAL CC16 levels might be suitable to be used as markers of lung injury in this polytrauma model.


Subject(s)
Lung Injury , Multiple Trauma , Shock, Hemorrhagic , Thoracic Injuries , Animals , Swine , Interleukin-8 , Multiple Trauma/complications , Biomarkers , Disease Models, Animal , Thoracic Injuries/complications
5.
authorea preprints; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-AUTHOREA PREPRINTS | ID: ppzbmed-10.22541.au.164865039.91322224.v1

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia may cause cystic features of lung parenchyma which can resolve or progress to larger blebs. Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) was reported as a complication of COVID-19 with an incidence of 1% in hospitalized patients, in 3% of patients hospitalized with pneumonia, in 6% mechanically ventilated patients and in 1% of decased patients. Pneumothorax was more likely in patients with neutrophilia, severe lung injury and a prolonged clinical course. We present 11 cases of SP managed with chest tube thoracostomy (CTT) or high dose oxygen therapy. Isolated SP was detected in all cases. Eight cases were male and three cases were female. There were bilateral ground-glass opacities or pulmonary infiltrates in the parenchyma of the ten cases. We detected neutrophilia, lymphopenia and increased CRP, Ferritin, LDH, D-Dimer, IL-6 levels in almost all cases. CTT was sufficient to treat pneumothorax in our nine of case. In two cases, pneumothorax healed with high dose oxygen therapy. Favipiravir and antibiotic treatment were given to different ten patients. In our institution, all patients with COVID-19 infection were placed on prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation, unless contraindicated. The treatments of patients diagnosed with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax during the pandemic period and those diagnosed with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax in the previous three years were compared with the durations of tube thoracostomy performed in both groups. The increased number of cases of pneumothorax suggests that pneumothorax may be a complication of covid-19 infection. During medical treatment of covid-19, pneumothorax may be the only reason for hospitalization. Although tube thoracostomy is a sufficient treatment option in most cases, clinicians should be aware of the difficulties that may arise in diagnosis and treatment.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases , Lung Injury , Pneumonia , Thoracic Injuries , COVID-19 , Corneal Opacity , Neural Tube Defects , Lymphopenia
6.
Zentralbl Chir ; 146(6): 612-616, 2021 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1556002

ABSTRACT

The most common cause of pneumomediastinum is trauma. However, in the context of COVID-19 pneumonia, this clinical picture is more often found in patients without underlying exogenous injury. Pathophysiologically, a cause analogous to the Macklin effect is suspected here, in which tears at the alveolar level lead to emphysema along the tracheobronchial tree with concentrating in the mediastinum. Here we present a case series of eight patients who were treated in our intensive care unit. In all patients, mediastinal emphysema could already be seen in the chest X-ray. Five patients also received a computed tomography scan of the thorax. Six patients had invasive ventilation. All patients received corticosteroids, anticoagulation and antibiotics. Pleural drainage was applied only in patients with an additional pneumothorax (n = 5). Bronchoscopy was performed only if there was a suspicion of iatrogenic injury to the tracheobronchial tree in relation to the appearance of the pneumomediastinum (n = 2). Three patients died during intensive care as part of the COVID-19 disease. A prognostic relationship between the occurrence of a pneumomediastinum and a fatal course of the disease is discussed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Thoracic Injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Humans , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Unfallchirurg ; 124(5): 358-361, 2021 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1217422

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide and leads to high morbidity and mortality. Clinical experience regarding the surgical management in COVID-19 patients is limited. We report the interdisciplinary approach in a COVID-19 patient with severe thoracic trauma and pulmonary symptoms, who was admitted to the emergency unit after blunt chest trauma with dislocated serial rib fractures and concomitant hemothorax.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Rib Fractures , Thoracic Injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Aged , Humans , Rib Fractures/complications , Rib Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Rib Fractures/surgery , SARS-CoV-2 , Thoracic Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Injuries/surgery
9.
Acta Orthop ; 92(3): 249-253, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1062816

ABSTRACT

Background and purpose - COVID-19 lockdowns have resulted in noteworthy changes in trauma admissions. We report and compare the incidence and characteristics of severe injuries (New Injury Severity Score [NISS] > 15) during the COVID-19 lockdown in Finland with earlier years.Methods - We retrospectively analyzed incidence rate, injury severity scores, injury patterns, and mechanisms of injury of all severely injured patients (NISS >15) in 4 Finnish hospitals (Tampere University Hospital, Kuopio University Hospital, Central Finland Hospital, Mikkeli Central Hospital) during the 11-week lockdown period (March 16-May 31, 2020) with comparison with a matching time period in earlier years (2016-2018). These 4 hospitals have a combined catchment area of 1,150,000 people or roughly one-fifth of the population of Finland.Results - The incidence rate of severe injuries during the lockdown period was 4.9/105 inhabitants (95% CI 3.7-6.4). The incidence rate of severe injuries during years 2016-2018 was 5.1/105 inhabitants (CI 3.9-6.5). We could not detect a significant incidence difference between the lockdown period and the 3 previous years (incidence rate difference -0.2 (CI -2.0 to 1.7). The proportion of traffic-related accidents was 55% during the lockdown period and 51% during previous years. There were no detectable differences in injury patterns. During the lockdown period, the mean age of patients was higher (53 years vs. 47 years, p = 0.03) and the rate of severely injured elderly patients (aged 70 or more) was higher (30% vs. 16%).Interpretation - Despite heavy social restrictions, the incidence of severe injuries during the lockdown period was similar to previous years. Notably, a decline in road use and traffic volumes did not reduce the number of severe traffic accidents. Although our data is compatible with a decrease of 2.0 to an increase of 1.7 severely injured patients per 105 inhabitants, we conclude that severely injured patients do not disappear even during pandemic and stabile hospital resources are needed to treat these patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/epidemiology , Abbreviated Injury Scale , Abdominal Injuries/epidemiology , Abdominal Injuries/etiology , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Cohort Studies , Communicable Disease Control , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Craniocerebral Trauma/etiology , Extremities/injuries , Facial Injuries/epidemiology , Facial Injuries/etiology , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Injury Severity Score , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvis/injuries , Public Policy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology , Soft Tissue Infections/etiology , Thoracic Injuries/epidemiology , Thoracic Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/etiology
10.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-49338.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19 disease. It was identified in December 2019 and rapidly evolved into a pandemic. During the outbreak of COVID-19, researches demonstrated its effect on many systems, including the nervous system. In our clinic, we have reported an impact of SARS-CoV-2, causing the ischaemic stroke.Case Report: A 62-year-old Sudanese male with some comorbidities brought to the A&E with fever, chest symptoms, and acute evolving left-sided hemiplegia power grade 0/5 MRCS with left upper motor neuron facial palsy. Investigations: CT brain: right middle cerebral artery MCA infarction. CT- chest: bilateral ground-glass appearance. COVID-19 Test was positive. elevated D-dimer and C-reactive protein.Discussion: A retrospective study of data from the COVID-19 outbreak in China showed that the incidence of stroke among hospitalized patients was approximately 5%. The fact that COVID-19 is an acute inflammatory condition associated with an increased incidence of fatty plaques formation, injury of the vascular wall, and hypercoagulability, causing brain infarct can be a reasonable hypothesis.ConclusionPatients with COVID-19 are at increased risk of thrombo-embolization, leading to arterial and venous cerebrovascular accident. This case report enhances the importance of further studies to clarify the relationship between stroke and COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Stroke , Venous Thromboembolism , Thrombophilia , Fever , Thoracic Injuries , Cerebral Infarction , Brain Infarction , Facial Paralysis , COVID-19 , Hemiplegia , Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL